On 09/01/2008, Yu-Teh Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got question about why haskell insist to be a purely FL. I mean is > there any feature which is only support by pure?
Have a look at the ueber-retrospective on Haskell, fifty-five pages of all the history and motivation one could possibly want. <http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/papers/history-of-haskell/> It's interesting reading, I promise! ;-) D. -- Dougal Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.dougalstanton.net _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
