Exactly. And that must be one of the reasons the Java designers said
"no" to operator overloading? That kind of programmers just don't like
operators I guess. But we do :-) Although I would prefer nice math
symbols and layout instead of the :~> ASCII art.
Thielemann wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
But when I show typical Haskell code to object-oriented friends of mine,
they get scared because it looks like math, with all the symbols and
short names.
They will feel like a C programmer looking at C++ code, wondering how the
heck an output stream can be left shifted by a number using << . :-)
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
