It looks quite clean (no funny business in Setup.lhs). I would favor using this cabalized version over the other. Thanks!
So, autoconf/configure generate cryptol.buildinfo from cryptol.buildinfo.in. Did you change configure.ac much? And the Makefile is no longer needed at all, right? - Phil 2008/4/23 Gwern Branwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So recently I spent a bit of time working on a cabalization of Darcs. It > works well for me, and is reasonably easy to apply (attached are three files; > do a 'darcs get --lazy http://darcs.net' with Darcs-2 to get the latest, and > copy the files into it, the usual autoconf, and it should then work as > normal; if this doesn't work for you, I'd appreciate knowing). > > My question for y'all is: would you find an unofficial version of Darcs - > one with the cabalization added and uploaded to Hackage - useful? Or would it > just be frustrating and redundant and Not Good? > > (If yes, any suggestions for a package name? 'darcs' is out, but 'darcs-cb' > and 'darcs-cabalized' strike me as horribly clunky or obscure.) > > -- > gwern > Threat WANK football Talent anarchy RIT interception Hutsul forschung ISS > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
