Hi > declaration with a regular syntax. For example: > > import Data.Map as Map > unqualified (Map, (\\)) > qualified (lookup, map, null) > hiding (filter)
I think I prefer this to my proposal, plus its closer to the current syntax. I think its also nearly equal to what Tom Davie came up with, given some keyword renaming. If we dropped the unqualified keyword, and just required unqualified things to come directly after, we get the full benefits of not introducing any keywords. > * A special case can be made when all three clauses are dropped so that, if > there's no 'as'-clause then everything is imported unqualified, otherwise > everything is imported qualified. That's not the current semantics. Currently 'as' means everything is imported unqualified and also qualified. > Why 'implicit' and 'explicit'? Do you mean something like 'include' and > 'exclude'? I want to refer to these things explicitly (with a module name), I want to refer to these things implicitly (without a module name). I have no particular attachment to the keywords - think of it as a discussion starter rather than a suggestion. Thanks Neil _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
