On 17 Dec 2008, at 03:14, Tony Hannan wrote:
Hello,
Can someone describe the advantages and disadvantages of the Yampa
library versus the Reactive library for functional reactive
programming, or point me to a link.
Thanks,
Tony
P.S. It is hard to google for Yampa and Reactive together because
"reactive" as in "function reactive programming" always appears with
Yampa
Advantages of Yampa:
• Just at the moment, slightly more polished.
• (maybe) harder to introduce space/time leaks.
Advantages of Reactive:
• More functional programming like -- doesn't require you to use
arrows everywhere, and supports a nice applicative style.
• In very active development.
• Active community.
Hope that helps -- my personal preference is that Reactive is the one
I'd use for any FRP project at the moment.
Bob_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
