On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Don Stewart <d...@galois.com> wrote: > wchogg: >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:32 AM, John A. De Goes <j...@n-brain.net> wrote: >> > >> > Haskell's networking support is very rudimentary. Erlang's is quite >> > sophisticated. For network intensive applications, especially those >> > requiring messaging, fault-tolerance, distribution, and so forth, there's >> > no >> > doubt that Erlang is a more productive choice. >> > >> > Not because of the language, per se, but because of all the stuff that is >> > packaged with it, or available for it. >> >> Now I understand that there aren't(?) any Haskell implementations that >> can act as distributed nodes the way the Erlang implementation can <snip> > There's nothing stopping you using Haskell nodes in a distributed > fashion, and indeed there are groups doing this.
Didn't realize it was charted territory. Sorry about that. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
