bulat.ziganshin: > Hello Achim, > > Saturday, February 21, 2009, 1:17:08 AM, you wrote: > > >> nothing new: what you are not interested in real compilers comparison, > >> preferring to demonstrate artificial results > >> > > ...that we have a path to get better results than gcc -O3 > > -funroll-loops, and it's within reach... we even can get there now, > > albeit not in the most hack-free way imaginable? > > well, can this be made for C++? yes. moreover, gcc does this trick > *automatically*, while with ghc we need to write 50-line program using > Template Haskell and then run it through gcc - and finally get exactly > the same optimization we got automatic for C code > > so, again: this confirms that Don is always build artificial > comparisons, optimizing Haskell code by hand and ignoring obvious ways > to optimize Haskell code. unfortunately, this doesn't work in real > live. and even worse - Don reports this as fair Haskell vs C++ > comparison
This is extremely depressing to read after the good results and lessons of this thread. -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
