Hello John, Saturday, February 21, 2009, 2:14:25 AM, you wrote:
> Heh. He probably meant something more like "jhc is not a production > compiler" which is true for a lot of projects. For projects of > substantial size or that require many extensions, jhc falls somewhat > short. It is getting better though. Of course, help is always > appreciated. :) what is "substantial size"? can jhc be used for video codec, i.e. probably no extensions - just raw computations, and thousands or tens of thousands LOCs? -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
