Am Sonntag, 22. Februar 2009 00:21 schrieb Bulat Ziganshin: > Hello Louis, > > Saturday, February 21, 2009, 4:16:10 AM, you wrote: > > In the meantime, a brief summary: > > a minor correction: the best gcc result shown in the thread was 50x > faster than Don's one, so you need to miltiple all ratios by a factor > of 50
You're referring to the freak result of Dan Doel? Come on, be serious, please. I have a Haskell result that runs in 7ms, too. Just use a rewrite rule and hey presto :) > > > Straightforward and simple Haskell code, written by an individual > > aware of issues with tail recursion and stream fusion, is frequently > > within 3x the speed of GCC code when compiled with appropriate > > optimizations in GHC. > > yes, within 150x margin Bulat, your obsession has become obnoxious and ridiculous. > > > When performance is an absolute necessity, > > Haskell code can sometimes be manually modified (e.g. with manual > > loop unrolls) to equal GCC in performance. > > yes, to make it only 50x slower while being only 7 times larger (i > mean source lines) > > > Can we move on? > > yes, we can! :) Apparently not :( _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe