* Peter Verswyvelen <bugf...@gmail.com> [2009-02-25 23:15:24 +0100]: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Peter Hercek <pher...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > * An LGPL library will force commercial users to release their source code > > only to the users of their program (which already bought it) and only for > > the purpose of recompiling with a newer version of the LGPL library. > > Does this also mean one can't make closed source but *free* software > that uses LGPL libs? Since all users can then potentially request the > source code? E.g. suppose Google would have used LGPL libraries to > implement parts of their search engine...
Google doesn't distribute code or binaries for google.com, though (although there is the appliance stuff..) -- mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
