On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 16:36 +0200, Ketil Malde wrote: > Duncan Coutts <duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.uk> writes: > > > The PVP says: > > > 1. If any entity was removed, or the types of any entities > > or the definitions of datatypes or classes were changed, > > or instances were added or removed, then the new A.B > > must be greater than the previous A.B. > > ..and this should be machine-checkable, no? Adding support for this > to Hackage, so that conforming/non-conforming libraries could be > highlighted might make a good Hac or (part of a) GSoC project.
Yes exactly. We proposed it for this summer's GSoC but it didn't quite make the final cut. http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/summer-of-code/ticket/1565 Duncan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
