On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:39 PM, John Meacham<j...@repetae.net> wrote:
> > (+>) seems to imply to me that the operator is non-associative. Something > like (<>) or (<+>) would be better. > It's too similar to the applicative (*>), and implies all sorts of things like different types of the two arguments and so on. D -- Dougal Stanton dou...@dougalstanton.net // http://www.dougalstanton.net _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
