On Thursday 09 July 2009, Cristiano Paris wrote: > Thanks. In fact, I was stuck trying to find an example which couldn't > be written using Python's iterators. The only difference coming up to > my mind was that Haskell's lists are a more natural way to express a > program relying on laziness. That was the reason why added the clause > "at least not elegantly" in my first post.
Hi,
I recently tried writing some code to simulate a certain protocol in
Python.
I thought I'll go the "smart" way and rely on the Python yield construct to
do a CPS transformation of my code.
While this worked to a certain extent, composability was a problem,
because
any sub-procedure which used yield (and thus was an iterator) required being
called in a rather inelegant way.
Thanks!
Marcin Kosiba
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
