Johan Tibell <johan.tib...@gmail.com> writes:

> I agree with Don. Also, I don't think that a Unicode type should
> mention what encoding it uses as it's an implementation detail.

Right.  I see from the documentation that it uses Word16s (and presumably
the utf-16 encoding).  Out of curiosity, why was this particular
encoding chosen, as opposed to utf-8 or utf-32/ucs-4?  Any benchmarks or
other information?

-k
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to