Hi,

A DSL is just a domain-specific language. It doesn't imply any specific implementation technique.

An *embedded* DSL is a library implemented in a more general language, which has been designed to give the "feeling" of a stand-alone language. Still nothing about implementation.

A *shallow embedding* of a DSL is when the "evaluation" is done immediately by the functions and combinators of the DSL. I don't think it's possible to draw a line between a combinator library and a shallowly embedded DSL.

A *deep embedding* is when interpretation is done on an intermediate data structure.

/ Emil



Günther Schmidt skrev:
Hi all,


for people that have followed my posts on the DSL subject this question probably will seem strange, especially asking it now.

I have read quite a lot lately on the subject, most of it written by the great old ones, (come on guys you know whom I mean :)).

What I could gather from their papers was, that a DSL is basically something entirely abstract as such, ie. it allows you build and combine expressions in a language which is specific for your problem domain. Irregardless of further details on how to do that, and there are quite a few, the crux as such is that they are abstract of "meaning".

The meaning depends how you *evaluate* the expression, which can be in more than merely one way, which is where, as far as I understand it, the true power lies.


So, you might wonder, since I figured it out this far, why ask what a DSL is?

Because out there I see quite a lot of stuff that is labeled as DSL, I mean for example packages on hackage, quite useuful ones too, where I don't see the split of assembling an expression tree from evaluating it, to me that seems more like combinator libraries.

Thus:

What is a DSL?


Günther


_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to