jake.mcarthur:
> I've run into an issue with inlining that I'm not sure how to work  
> around. I am instantiating some pre-existing type classes with  
> Vector-based types. There already exist generic functions in modules I  
> do not control that use this type class, and they are not tagged with  
> the INLINE pragma. I am doubtful, but I figure it is worth at least  
> asking: is there some practical workaround for this kind of situation  
> that anybody knows about?
>

I don't know of a way, other than patching the library code.
If it makes a difference to you, it probably makes a difference to lots
of people.

-- Don
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to