http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~txa/publ/ydtm.pdf
Andrew Coppin wrote: > Liam O'Connor wrote: >> It means that not only can values have types, types can have values. >> > > Uh, don't types have values *now*? > >> An example of the uses of a dependent type would be to encode the >> length of a list in it's type. >> > > Oh, right. So you mean that as well as being able to say "Foo Bar", > you can say "Foo 7", where 7 is (of course) a value rather than a > type. (?) > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe -- Tony Morris http://tmorris.net/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
