On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 15:35, Paulo Tanimoto <ptanim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Apologies if I'm asking you to repeat yourself, but I couldn't find > the explanation. What was the reason why you went with IterateeM > instead of IterateeMCPS? Simplicity?
Iteratees are difficult enough to understand already -- requiring prospective users to learn and understand CPS would just be another roadblock. The CPS implementation is also slower -- I performed some basic benchmarking of IterateeM.hs and IterateeMCPS.hs, and CPS is only faster without optimizations. At -O, they are equal, and at -O2, IterateeM is faster. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
