On 6 September 2010 21:57, han <e...@xtendo.org> wrote: > So the question is: Do you agree that "Graphics.Rendering.OpenGL" actually > should have been "Graphics.OpenGL" (or just OpenGL) for wieldiness?
I think Graphics.OpenGL would have sufficed, unless there was sufficient reason to want to group it with other rendering-specific modules. Admittedly, I'm biased, in that I proposed a new top-level Graph.* namespace on the libraries mailing list and out of those few that responded the main response was that there was no point in such a new top-level namespace. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
