Richard O'Keefe <o...@cs.otago.ac.nz> wrote: > I thought "X is a mirror of Y" meant X would be a read-only replica of Y, > with some sort of protocol between X and Y to keep X up to date. > As long as the material from Y replicated at X is *supposed* to be > publicly available, I don't see a security problem here. Only Y accepts > updates from outside, and it continues to do whatever authentication it > would do without a mirror. The mirror X would *not* accept updates.
At the very least, this assumes that you trust all the mirror operators. Sure, I'm trustworthy, but how about those other guys? >:) -=rsw _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
