On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Jake McArthur <jake.mcart...@gmail.com> wrote: > So everybody doesn't have to go watch it, here is a shortened version of > what Steele said in the video: > >> Although Fortress is originally designed as an object-oriented framework >> in which to build an array-style scientific programming language, [...] as >> we've experimented with it and tried to get the parallelism going we found >> ourselves pushed more and more in the direction of using immutable data >> structures and a functional style of programming. [...] If I'd known seven >> years ago what I know now, I would have started with Haskell and pushed it a >> tenth of the way toward Fortran instead of starting with Fortran and pushing >> it nine tenths of the way toward Haskell. > > I think I might use this in some slides soon. :) Thanks for pointing it out!
The big things I can recall missing were pattern matching and Haskell-style classes rather than OO + generic typing. The Fortress type system actually approximates pattern matching in some interesting ways, but it's not the same. -Jan-Willem Maessen Experienced Fortress programmer (!) > > - Jake > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
