On Saturday 19 February 2011 1:11:23 AM Vasili I. Galchin wrote: > BTW I was thinking of http://www.ats.org when I asked this question.
Technically speaking, if one considers ATS to be dependently typed, then one might as well also consider GHC to be dependently typed (with the right extensions enabled). ATS would easily be a nicer language in that respect, though. -- Dan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
