> However, I'd be curious to know if (a) There are better or more > idiomatic ways of achieving the same effect, and (b) Whether or not I > should be doing this at all; It did occur to me that this seems rather > trying to re-implement OOP-style inheritance with typeclasses, and > therefore perhaps not a very Haskellish approach to designing
Could you give a specific example of the problem you're trying to solve? _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
