On 23/11/11 23:02, Tom Murphy wrote:
Is there a reason that the Haskell 2010 report is in a subdirectory of
haskell.org/onlinereport <http://haskell.org/onlinereport> (which
currently points to the Haskell98 standard)?
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/ -- Haskell98
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/haskell2010/ -- Haskell2010
If it's for historical reasons - because books etc. use this URL for the
98 standard, then I'd highly recommend making a new directory called
"currentreport" or something (if there isn't one already).
IMO, a book author should expect that an URL like
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/ could change to point to a new
version, since it doesn't mention a version number or date anywhere.
The most sensible directory structure would be:
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/haskell98
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/haskell2010
Where the onlinereport/index.html says something like:
Latest version:
* <haskell2010>
Previous versions:
* <haskell98>
Twan
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
