On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 01:15:03PM -0800, John Meacham wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:21:26PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > > Great. Apart from my misgivings about allowing cooperative scheduling > > at all, here's a few comments on the proposal: > > much much preferable to a standard that not everyone can implement. :)
Are there potential users for the compromise interface? I had the impressions that those wanting concurrency needed the fairness guarantees. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
