Re: Standard Haskell

[Chris Burdorf]

>   After all, a lot of work has been spent making personal computers upwards
> compatible, so why not computer languages?
>

As a user I find this VERY appealing.  It can be very discouraging
developing in a new language, if the definition is changing so that
your code needs to be regularly upgraded.  However, I also understand
that once a language gets nailed down, it can die.  So perhaps this
is the best of both worlds.

Chris