It's not formally defined, I'm afraid. The Haskell report simply
desribes how to
translate some constructs into simpler ones. It does not formally
define the set
of simpler one.
(This isn't something I propose to fix in the revised Haskell 98
report!)
Simon
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Juan Carlos Arévalo Baeza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: 10 August 2001 23:13
| To: Haskell List
| Subject: Haskell Kernel
|
|
|
| Is there any place where I could find detailed
| documentation on the Haskell kernel? The Haskell Report
| doesn't seem to have much on this.
|
| Salutaciones,
| JCAB
| email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| ICQ: 101728263
| The Rumblings are back: http://www.JCABs-Rumblings.com
|
|
|
| _______________________________________________
| Haskell mailing list
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
|
winmail.dat
