I agree with Malcolm, with the possible addition of: keep -fglasgow-exts as it is (or, even, perhaps continue making it the "add all extensions keyword). also have -fffi, -farrows, -fth, etc. but also have, -fnoth and -fnoffi. that way, if a lot of us have code that uses all the extensions other than TH and have lots of code that looks like (foo$bar), we can just to -fglasgow-exts -fnoth.
seems to be a win-win. > The obvious approach is to do both (in exactly the manner of > {-fffi, -farrows, -fwith}), namely to introduce a separate flag > for each extension, but (temporarily) retain -fglasgow-exts as > a catch-all for the complete set. Eventually, -fglasgow-exts > could disappear. > > With this suggestion, I would certainly be in favour of separate > flags for existing extensions. > > Regards, > Malcolm > _______________________________________________ > Haskell mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell -- -- Hal Daume III | [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Arrest this man, he talks in maths." | www.isi.edu/~hdaume _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell