Note that in an OO programming language with generic classes ...
(We shouldn't make our functional designs more different from the OO ones,> than they need to be.)
why should *we* care :-)
more often than not, OO design is resticted and misleading.
you see how most OO languages jump through funny hoops (in this case, generics) because they just lack proper higher-order types.
good luck with your library. but make sure you study existing (FP) designs, e. g. Chris Okasaki's Edison:
http://www.eecs.usma.edu/Personnel/okasaki/pubs.html#hw00
--
-- Johannes Waldmann, Tel/Fax: (0341) 3076 6479 / 6480 --
------ http://www.imn.htwk-leipzig.de/~waldmann/ ---------
_______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
