I wrote: > > While checking for floating-point overflow and > > underflow conditions, I tried to create... > > Infinity with the literal "1e100000"... Is > > there a better way to check for Infinity?
Tomasz Zielonka wrote: > Did you try isNaN and isInfinite? Oops. Thanks! Thanks also to Lennart Augustsson. I wrote: > > ...I tried to create... Infinity with the > > literal "1e100000"... GHC... goes into a deep > > trance... Tomasz Zielonka wrote: > ...it is equivalent to (fromRational 1e100000), > and (1e100000 :: Rational) can take a > substantial amount of space. I see. That explains it. Thanks! Regards, Yitz _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell