Hi Bulat, Just a partial answer for now:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:29:58PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > > Friday, September 8, 2006, 5:52:57 AM, you wrote: > > what is a 'base' library now? it is the library that implements common set > of operations for latest versions of ghc, hugs and nhc. it contains > low-level implementation for ghc, but relies on separate hugsbase > package for hugs (the same for nhc, afaiu). so, first step is obvious > - separate ghc-base library from the rest. hugsbase, ghc-base and > nhc-base packages should provide common set of low-level operations, As it happens I was working on getting GHC to use cabal to build base et al on the plane the other day, and I had a brief look at this. Unfortunately there is a tangled web of dependencies, e.g. you need the low level Int# stuff in ghc-base, then Int in base, but then any other GHC-specific stuff can't use Int because it's in base. We could put everything into ghc-base and just re-export the common stuff in base, but then we can't share any code between ghc, hugs etc. I haven't looked in detail to see just how bad the problem is, but I agree it would be really good if we could split things up somehow so that base (or whatever base gets split into) is the same everywhere. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
