Yes as long as you have phase reversed b0s you can have the DWIs have unique 
directions. The HCP diffusion pipeline might need modification to accommodate 
that.

Peace,

Matt.

From: 
<hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org>>
 on behalf of HMZ <hmz...@163.com<mailto:hmz...@163.com>>
Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 2:14 AM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Cc: "g...@pku.edu.cn<mailto:g...@pku.edu.cn>" 
<g...@pku.edu.cn<mailto:g...@pku.edu.cn>>, Jia-Hong Gao 
<j...@pku.edu.cn<mailto:j...@pku.edu.cn>>
Subject: [HCP-Users] Question about DWI protocol

Dear HCP experts,

This is Meizhen Han from Center for MRI research at Peking University in China. 
I'm writing for seeking a solution for the problem we encountered during the 
application of HCP MRI sequence on our recent research.

I noticed that HCP acquired DWI data twice with reversed phase direction in 
order to calculate the fieldmap, which I think is perfect but a little 
time-consuming especially when 2 or 3 gradient tables are used.

I'm wondering whether it is OK to acquire one phase encoding direction of one 
gradient table and reversed direction of another gradient table.
Taking Lifespan DWI protocol of UM for example, can we only get DWI_dir98_AP 
and DWI_dir99_PA, and then take out b0 images in both files to caculate 
fieldmap?

Any relevant information and idea would help a lot. Thank you very much!

Looking forward to your reply.

--
Best Regards!
Meizhen Han

--
Meizhen Han
PhD Candidate
Center for MRI Research
Peking University
Beijing, China





_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to