I am not part of such a consensus. I don’t know if there have been rigorous comparison of the two sequences or by what metrics it is being asserted that MGH outperforms CMRR. Perhaps you could ask your source for this recommendation why they say that?
Peace, Matt. From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org>> on behalf of "Juranek, Jenifer" <jenifer.jura...@uth.tmc.edu<mailto:jenifer.jura...@uth.tmc.edu>> Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 10:34 AM To: "HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>" <HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>> Subject: [HCP-Users] CMRR vs MGH multiband/SMS sequences Just curious if anyone is aware of head-to-head comparisons of CMRR and MGH MB/SMS sequences? Someone recently mentioned to me that “the general consensus is that MGH outperforms CMRR”. Is there a “general consensus” in the research community on this issue? Any differences between dMRI and fMRI applications? I’m interested in using an HCP-style acquisition protocol for a 5yr study about to start…from what I can tell, CMRR MB sequences have been selected across the board for HCP-style studies currently funded by NIH. Does anyone have any thoughts they can share? Many Thanks, Jenifer ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Jenifer Juranek, PhD Associate Professor Department of Pediatrics UTHealth Houston, TX 77030 713.500.8233 _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
