Thank you Tim and Matt for all the information.

I currently am not using the HCP and unfortunately do not have the time to 
reprocess the data.


I greatly appreciate the detailed explanation of the metric files and the 
difference between that and the label files.  I am very new to surfaces and so 
everything is helpful!


Just a couple more questions please.

How do I know whether I want to use the 'COLUMN' or 'ROW' option?

Is there a message board that I can look through other previously asked 
questions for future help?


Thanks again,

Jeanette


________________________________
From: Glasser, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 6:47 PM
To: NEUROSCIENCE tim; Kenley, Jeanette
Cc: hcp-users; Kaplan, Sydney
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] average dconn from individual dconns

To be more specific: In the HCP we use a technique called MIGP to make group 
fMRI data and generate dense connectomes from that.  Concatenated dense 
timeseries get very large when you have a lot of subjects and timepoints.

Matt.

From: 
<hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org>>
 on behalf of Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu<mailto:tsc...@mst.edu>>
Date: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 2:54 PM
To: "Kenley, Jeanette" <jkken...@wustl.edu<mailto:jkken...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: hcp-users 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>, "Kaplan, 
Sydney" <sydney.kap...@wustl.edu<mailto:sydney.kap...@wustl.edu>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] average dconn from individual dconns

The HCP pipelines deliberately resample the subcortical data in such a way that 
the subcortical voxels used in each subject are the same, this is how we handle 
the problem you are having.

If you concatenate your timeseries across subjects before correlation, you 
don't need to generate a dconn for every subject, so this strategy uses less 
disk space (but you have to be careful about normalization before 
concatenation).

Label files are not ROI files, though they might work in this case (you could 
instead use the .shape.gii files here: 
https://github.com/Washington-University/HCPpipelines/tree/master/global/templates/91282_Greyordinates).
  An ROI file is supposed to be a metric file (.func.gii, .shape.gii) of just 
1's and 0's (the actual logic used is "greater than zero").  Label files can be 
used as metric files, the warning is just to let you know that you did 
something unusual.  I'd need to see the actual error message to comment on it.

If you don't want to go back to the timeseries (or reprocess with the HCP 
pipelines), -cifti-restrict-dense-map may be the simplest solution.

Tim


On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:00 PM Kenley, Jeanette 
<jkken...@wustl.edu<mailto:jkken...@wustl.edu>> wrote:

I am still new to the wb_command suite and trying to understand how to best use 
them.


I have created an individual cifti (dconn.nii) for each of my subjects in 
32kfslr and would like to make an average.

I would like to use

wb_command -cifti-average output.dconn.nii -cifti subject1.dconn.nii -cift 
subject2.dconn.nii . . .-cifti subjectN.dconn.nii


But this results in a dimension mismatch since the sub cortical portions of the 
individual subjects are different.


Is there a way to only grab the surface data from each of the individual dconns 
so I do not get the dimension error.

I tried using

wb_command -cifti-restrict-dense-map  subjectN.dconn.nii 'ROW/COLUMN' 
subjectN_output.dconn.nii -left-roi $left -right-roi $right


where the left and right rois are:

subjectN.L.aparc.32k_fs_LR.label.gii

subjectN.R.aparc.32k_fs_LR.label.gii


but since I am newer to the wb_commands, I am not sure what each of the inputs 
should be or if this is the correct command.


This also resulted in an error.

WARNING: Metric File: subjectN.L.aparc.32k_fs_LR.label.gii contains data array 
with NIFTI_INTENT_LABEL !!!

WARNING: Metric File: subjectN.R.aparc.32k_fs_LR.label.gii contains data array 
with NIFTI_INTENT_LABEL !!!

As well as an error when I tried to use the file saying something about fields 
not being the same size.


Or is there a way to generate the surface dconns via command line without the 
subcortical information so I don't get the dimension mismatch error when I try 
to make an average?


Any help is greatly appreciated.  And specific example file names are also very 
much appreciated.


Thanks!



________________________________

The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to