So I started breaking out 3.3 as a separate code base on the Hibernate svn trunk. The first thing done was this org.hibernate.cache.Cache splitting. So at this point we now have the ability to be completely free in how we cache entity-data versus collection-data versus query-data versus timestamps-data within the same "second level cache".

Cool.

But now looking back at #1, I am no longer certain of the conclusions; and to me the wiki did not make it clear to me what the "long term" solution was supposed to be (nor really what the "short term" solution is/was either). Anyone remember the specific conclusions with regards to this point?

Long-term:
In Hibernate - use seperate caches which you have done for 3.3
In JBoss Cache - as it stands now you would have to use differnt jbosscache configurations. In older versions of JBC you would need different treecache.xml; but that has been simplified in later JBC's AFAIK - Manik/galder ? Depending on this and wether optimistic locking is a global or node level-and-down setting users might need some less or more complex "writing jbosscache config files
for hibernate" examples ;)

Short-term:
Write a cacheprovider that would use different jbosscaches for each "type" of cache.
Not sure if that still makes sense.

Re: #4 : what exactly are these differences? Now is the time to merge it back...

I recall these as being Bryan 2 things:

1) setting up JBC/Cacheprovider so it would use the correct classloader when loading data from the cache.

2) doing some "mutations"/magic-lookup of the cache region names to know which classloader to use (this might just me having nightmares, so need Bryan to certify ;) If it's true we would
need to look into the practicallity of that solution.

Re: #5 : what about the other solution I proposed where instead of registering synchs directly with the TC/TM, you instead delegate it to a strategy which can route the request back through Hibernate; Hibernate can then manage ordering the callbacks?

I don't recall more progress on that topic.

/max

Re: #6 : I'm actually in favor of just moving to the new (2.0) API; easier from a management perspective.
Ok, so my notes from the call, based on issues from the wiki


1. Multiple caches will probably only formally make it in the next major Hibernate release - 3.3.

2 Notes on putForExternalRead() functionality, in addition to the solution presented on the wiki:
- PFER only goes through if node does not exist; no-op otherwise
- Force asynchronous mode for replication or invalidation to prevent any blocking - 0ms lock timeout to prevent any blocking here either. If this fails, PFER is a no-op - no to separate thread necessary, since we will be operating with a 0ms timeout, async replication and a no-op if the node exists. The only real chance of any blocking here is JGroups FC which is considered small enough a case.

3. Since JBC 1.4.1.SP1, write locks are not acquired on parents when adding or removing children, to be more accurate to repeatable read semantics. WLs can still be acquired on parents if enabled in the configuration (see "LockParentForChildInsertRemove" in http://labs.jboss.com/file-access/default/members/jbosscache/freezone/docs/1.4.1.SP2/TreeCache/en/html/configuration.html, which defaults to false). As such, this contention should no longer be a problem.

4. Brian implemented for EJB3 clustering in AS 4.2, will make it's way back into HIbernate in the 3.3 timeframe?

5. Do nothing for now since the urgency is removed. Only fails on old versions of JBoss TS. In future (JBC 2.1 timeframe) look at what the microcontainer has to offer with synchronisation registrations.

6.  Coordination issue

7. Galder to come back with more details here, but general consensus is not to perform transparent retries. Feel free to add stuff I may have missed or further thoughts. Very useful and productive call!

Cheers,
Manik

_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev



--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen

Hibernate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hibernate.org

JBoss a division of Red Hat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Reply via email to