Subject: OLD BUT VERY RELEVANT!!!
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:51:29 +0300
"And Do Not Mix The Truth With The Falsehood"(TMQ 2:42)
States of Compromise are States of Falsehood the Ends Do Not Justify the
Means.
A deadly conflict is taking place right now all over the world. A battle for
the hearts and minds of the Muslims. A battle between Truth and Falsehood. A
constant bombardment of lies from the Western media. An unrelenting
onslaught by secular institutions and individuals. Portraying Islam as
blind, irrational and fanatical. Accusing Islam as oppressive and
destructive, having no place in the civilised world of today. A propaganda
campaign with one single aim. To achieve victory over Truth. To remove Islam
from the face of the earth., by making Muslims abandon it. The Jews and
Christians will never be pleased with you until you follow their Beliefs
(and leave your own). To win, Falsehood cannot accept any less than!
that. It
is the opposite of Truth. With the removal of Islam would come the complete
submission of the Islamic Ummah to all the falsehood that is thrust upon it.
The occupation of Islamic land, as is seen in Israel and Kashmir. The
slaughter of Muslims, as was seen during the Gulf war. The mass rape of the
daughters of the Ummah, as seen in Bosnia. The exploitation of the oil
resources in the Middle East, as seen in Saudi Arabia. The failure of this
propaganda is clear and total. This is because the Ummah has grown in its
awareness of Islam. Islam is now the fastest growing belief of the planet.
All over the Islamic land the Ummah is restless with the desire to see the
end of the implementation of kufr upon her. Full of expectation and the
return of Islam as a way of life. The truth is clearer in the hearts and
minds of Muslims. As it becomes clear, it stands apart from the falsehood.
Muslims are more able to see the battlelines between !
Islam and kufr
(falsehood). That they cannot mix, for anything less than the truth is
falsehood. Truth cannot compromise with falsehood for then what is left is
falsehood "And do not mix the truth with falsehood" (TMQ 2:42)
So Muslims can see clearly the battle between truth versus falsehood. Jihad
against those who occupy Islamic Land versus surrender to them. Unity of the
Islamic lands under one Khalif versus its division under the United nations.
Using the wealth of the Ummah for the citizens of the Islamic State versus
it having it stolen by multinational companies. Ruling by Islam versus
ruling by man made law, democracy. Making the truth the sole judgement in
each matter versus settling for less than that i.e., secularism.
So the forces of falsehood have devised a new plan of attack, compromise. A
plan that deals with the reality of Islam's hold on the hearts and minds of
Muslims. This new plan is to hide the ugly face of kufr behin!
d Islamic
slogans. To goad the Ummah to swallow the bitter pill of kufr by giving it
an Islamic flavouring. So Clinton tries to hide the ugly face of Israeli
occupation of Islamic land, by quoting Qur'anic verses on the white house
lawn. Numerous sheikhs in Islamic lands have fabricated fatwas to justify
the so-called peace process. Mixing kufr with Islam. A new kind of
falsehood, a falsehood with the truth mixed in. A falsehood called
compromise, making the eating of pig halal, as it were.
Surely the crowing glory for this devious plan is to try to hide entire
governments of compromise from the eyes of the Islamic Ummah. Shielding
their huge corruption by a few Shari'ah laws here and there. Governments
that are based on a mix of Islam and kufr. So the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
becomes the state of Tawheed because it implements a few of the punishments
from Shari'ah. Sudan becomes an Islamic Dowlah because it mentions the
Qur'an as one !
of the sources of its constitution. Iran and Pakistan adds the
prefix "Islamic republic of" and Saddam Hussein stuck "Allahu Akbar" onto
the Iraqi flag! To plead with the Ummah that these "Islamic" regimes are
somehow different from the other regimes that pollute the Islamic lands.
That Saudi Arabia is Islamic but Syria is not. That Sudan is Islamic but
Tunisia is not. To beg the Ummah to support them rather than remove them.
This is a lie. For despite their lipservice to Islam, a few Shari'ah laws
here and there, These "Islamic" governments are governments of falsehood
too, because they are built on compromise.
In fact the falsehood is the main ingredient in their compromise. Very
little of the compromise has Islamic laws. For these "Islamic" regimes have
pledged themselves to manmade law. In other words the whole basis for their
government is kufr. Even though Allah ta'ala accepts none other than His
law: "Indeed the rule is for none bu!
t Allah" (TMQ 6: )
So the latest liar, Arbakan of Turkey, showed one face to the Ummah and his
real face to the world when he swore to " respect the secular constitution
of the country, as well as the democratic and secular principles of
Attaturk".
Sudan in its constitution proudly boasts partners with Allah ta'ala, by
declaring that one of its source of law is the tradition of the Sudanese
people.
With such a corrupt basis other aspects are bound to manifest falsehood.
Their regimes are infested with nationalism and racism, even though the
Prophet (saw) said "Leave nationalism, it is rotten."
Despite this action being forbidden, all these so called 'Islamic States'
are built around a certain nationality so the heads of these states must be
of that race. So Iran insists that its leader must be Persian. Did the
Muslims of the first Islamic State in Madinah reject the Prophet (saw) as a
leader because he was not a native of Madinah?!
Also in Saudi Arabia there
are appeal courts which consider the tribe of a person in their assessment,
and non-Saudis cannot marry Saudi women.
Their two faced compromise is not confined to matters within the State. All
these nations for all their Islamic slogans are members of the racist
secular United nations. If this were not enough Arbakan of Turkey added
verbal support to what is written. He said he would ' honour all
international agreements and treaties which Turkey has signed'. For the'
Islamic republic of Pakistan' this involved sending her soldiers to fight
fellow Muslims in Somalia as part of the United Nation's Operation Restore
Hope.
The economy shows compromises. Arbakan said "the aim of our government is to
generate all conditions which help implement a free trade". What is meant by
free trade is that the foreign powers will have free access to the resources
of the Islamic Ummah. So it was King Fahd's 'State of Tawhid' !
that helped to
finance the massacre of Muslims during the Gulf war. The trade was so 'free'
that the Saudi regime went into debt for the first time in its history as it
couldn't pump oil out of the ground fast enough for Operation Desert Storm.
Even though by Islam such resources are prohibited to any individual or the
state, as by their nature they are public resources. For the Prophet (saw)
said "The human beings are partners in three things, waters, green pastures
and fire-based fuels".
These regimes deal freely in interest, a matter which is decisively rejected
in Islam.
Yet when they and their supporters are held to account for their compromise,
they have the gall to claim that Islam allows it. Rather than denouncing
their sinful deeds, they insist that Islam itself allows them to mix Islam
with kufr. Insisting that the eating of pig is halal as it were. So when
Muslims demand the correction of these sins, they claim that the Prop!
het
(saw) compromised. When Muslims work to remove their illegitimate rule, they
and their supporters plead with the Muslims to be patient. Insisting that
this compromise is only temporary and hat they will gradually introduce more
and more Islam. Claiming that Islam allows gradualism' (tadarruj). They
admit kufr is being implemented alongside the truth, but that this is a
temporary situation, a transitional stage. That one day by this compromise
they will establish the Khilafah. That gradually Islam will be established,
so the end justifies the means. That something is better than nothing. That
is like saying one needs to steal in order to pay Zakat. Eating pig-meat to
break the fast of Ramadan. Committing Zina in order to get married. These
actions would never be tolerated by them, yet they will commit the sin of
compromise to achieve the Islamic State.
It is clearly shown that this compromise is a lie against the Deen. For the
Proph!
et (saw) refused to compromise one Islamic Law. The Qur'aysh offered to
him control of the government for one entire year. None of the present
'Islamic' regimes' have anything even close to this offer. However the
Qur'aysh were rejected because they wanted to rule the next year and let the
people decide between Islam and kufr after that. Allah ta'ala rejected this
offer of compromise with Surah-al-Kafiroon.. Another tribe, Bani 'Amr bin
Sa'sa offered the Prophet (saw) government, but with one compromise. That
the ruler would come from them when the Prophet (saw) passed away. They were
rejected by the Prophet (saw) saying, that 'The authority is a matter of
Allah'. For compromising even one law is one law too many. Let alone the
huge compromises the existing regimes have made.
Islam must be implemented absolutely and exclusively.
As for their lie that gradualism (taddaruj) allows compromise. They
rightfully say that Qur'an was not revealed!
to the Prophet (saw) all at
once. They rightfully say that therefore the drinking of alcohol, marriage
to idolaters and dealing in interest were not prohibited at once. However
they then conclude that this justifies the gradual implementation of Islamic
laws and so it allows a situation of compromise. This conclusion is wrong.
This is because although the Qur'anic ayyahs were revealed gradually, the
rules that they carry are to be implemented completely once they were
revealed. So once the ayyah banning marriage to idolaters was revealed, no
one can marry an idolater from that time with the excuse that the rule is to
be gradually implemented. Furthermore, Allah Ta'ala has said. "Today I have
perfected your Deen and completed may favour upon you" (TMQ 5: 3)
Islamic revelation has been completed and all of Islam must be completely
implemented. There is no excuse for the existing regimes to implement kufr
with a sprinkling of Islam. To say!
otherwise would lead the door open for
the drinking of alcohol and the eating of pig.
Finally some would say correctly that under certain conditions the eating of
pig would be halal, under the Islamic law of duress (Idhtirar). That when
one is starving to the point of death , one may eat meat that is normally
forbidden if nothing else is available. They also correctly say that under
the Islamic law of compulsion (Ikrah), i.e. when one's life is threatened,
one can lie about their belief in Islam. However, they wrongfully conclude
that this allows them to implement other than Islam. Firstly no one
compelled them or forced them to take positions in government. Rather they
forced themselves upon the Ummah with a great greed to take power. Secondly
the rule of duress restricts permission to eating and drinking. It is not a
passport to permit all actions like stealing, adultery, murder and so on.
Muslims must denounce these regimes of comprom!
ise and their feeble lies for
excuses! Their actions are like those of the lying pretender An-Nadr ibn
al-Harith who used to stand in the wake of Rasul Allah (saw) and ask, "what
is the difference between what he has brought and what I bring?" His effect
was to undermine, and to divert those who had an inkling to the truth to
fall headlong into the falsehood. And rendered them wary and distrustful of
the truthful.
Muslims, to hide the ugly face of kufr in the warm Islamic sentiment is
indeed a lowly tactic. For it enslaves many Muslims instead of fighting to
remove the kufr regimes, working for them, believing them to be Islam.
Instead of exposing the kufr of Saudi Arabia and Iran, supporting them.
Rather than accounting the ruler, to be patient with them. Pushing the
agenda of these regimes rather than working to remove them. Their feeble
excuses must be ripped asunder, so that the Ummah can see they are no
different from all the othe!
r regimes that pollute the Islamic lands. That
they like all the others must be removed. For they deny Islam its rightful
place to be the sole judge on all matters. They deny Islam its role as
guardian for the land, lives, wealth and honour of the Islamic Ummah. They
incur the wrath of Allah for their trifling gains of power. Hoping to lull
the Ummah into a false sense of security, before dealing her the fatal blow
of secularism whilst her guard is down. Their actions are like those of the
Jews. "Woe then unto those who write down, with their own hands (something
which they claim to be ) divine writ) and then say, "This is from Allah' in
order to acquire a trifling gain thereby; woe unto them for what their hands
have written and woe unto them for all that they may have gained" (TMQ
2:79).
Muslims must gain the knowledge of Truth so that it is clear from the
falsehood! Surely the lying pretender is distinguished by his inability to
pro!
vide the Truth. Do not be satisfied with compromise. It is forbidden. Do
not be satisfied with the Islamisation of kufr. Speak out against it. So
that Jihad stands clear from surrender and humiliation. So Khilafah stands
clear from democracy, dictatorship and monarchy. So that unity of the
Islamic Ummah stands clear from its division. Gain culture so hat it fuels
our desire to remove these kufr regimes that pollute the Islamic Lands. Gain
culture for Insh'Allah this generation will be the generation of the
Khilafah. The generation that will account that Khalif so that future
generations will never again face the tyranny of States of Falsehood.
NB Afghanistan to the list as the latest of false "Islamic States"
> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/ms-tnef name=winmail.dat
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
