Why dont valve make another list srcds_linux? So all you guys that whant to talk about the srcds can post in there? Learn that there is a BIG difference between hlds_linux and srcds_linux.
I have testet ALOT of server running 75fps - 1000fps. And YES, the higher the FPS and sys_tickrate the server has, the better the gameplay. And NO, im not 15 years old and stupid. For source i have no idea.. its very possible that you have right in that question. But in HLDS youre wrong. So please.. PLEASE make difference when you post if it regards hlds or srcds. Regards >On 10/3/07, Whisper [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> -- >> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] >> Heh >> >> Server fps is not a calculation under SRCDS >> >> Server fps is how often per second the SRCDS process does Input & Output >> >> A few interesting points to note. >> >> The default fps_max is 300 >> The default sv_maxupdaterate is 60 >> The default tickrate is 33 >> >> No Windows OS based machine by default will do more than 64 fps >> >> It is my understanding the the default kernel timer for Linux is 100 (I >> could be wrong about that) >> >> Now the question becomes knowing all of this, is what was the design >> consideration Valve had at the time when choosing an fps_max value of 300 >> when all other default values for SRCDS & Operating systems would never >> have >> taken advanatge of it. Was there a reason, or was it some arbitrary value >> choosen for no particular reason? >> >> As for the reason for increasing the server fps to values higher than >> default, it should now be apparent that the reason for doing so is that if >> you run a higher than default tickrate server, you are more than likely >> going to have clients running higher rate settings, and since the server >> calculations only occur on each tick, to ensure that the server is using >> the >> most up to date data when making these calculations, it helps to have a >> server running at a higher fps. >> >> Whether 1000fps is demonstrably better than 500fps is probably more >> marketing than any real subjective or quatifiable measure of server >> quality, >> and it is most important to run a server with stable fps rather than an >> unsustainable high fps. >> >> On 10/3/07, HLDS [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I found an interestic article about server side FPS.. >> > >> > You can read it here >> > >> > >> > >> http://www.meatfactory.net/index.php\?option=com_content&task=view&id=220&Itemid=2 >> > >> > After reading the article, I totally agree, and I've always thought the >> > same thing myself. >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> > please visit: >> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > >> -- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >-- > >_______________________________________________ >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please >visit: >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
