Did this patch make it into a snapshot?
-----Original Message----- From: Geoff Hutchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [htdig-dev] Re: testing On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 07:52 PM, Lachlan Andrew wrote: > This should be a lesson to me about posting bug reports > from memory... (One day I'll get my development machine on > line :) Yes, another good lesson is to post bug reports to SF.net so we can also track them. ;-) > The backward-compatible fix is to fix htsearch (a five > line patch) Let's do this ASAP. We can back it out later, but at least the code will be temporarily consistent. > but the more elegand solution would be to > change htdig to treat the two consistently. My > preference would be to specify the *true* location of all > words, even counting short words. That way we could > distinguish between a true phrase match and a "phrase > match, but possibly with short words in between". Yes, I agree that this is The Right Way(tm). It's definitely a bug that it's not currently specifying the *true* location of words. BTW, do you have a SourceForge account? We should get you CVS access. Cheers, -Geoff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
