Greetings, That was a trial forward-port from 3.1.6. It is just defensive programming not to try using a string of negative length.
(Sorry about the lack of Changelog entry. I've since discovered that Changelog entries *aren't* generated as part of the CVS checkin process. *sheepish grin* ) On Saturday 04 January 2003 02:05, Budd, Sinclair wrote: > I notice that there is a fix in 3.2.0b4-20021229 String.cc but no mention > in the changelog. What is the rational for change? > > < if (s && len > 0) > --- > > if (s && len != 0) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
