Here's a performance quirk I've found. I was running some timed tests on our development box and noticed that the 3.2.0b5 release was causing performance to suffer for logged in users. System load and memory were OK. But the web site and databases were on the same disk so things were getting disk-bound. Moving the databases and logging to a separate disk solved the problem and I'm rerunning the tests.
i/o problems haven't been an issue with 3.1.6. Does 3.2 do more writing? >> Job well done! It configured/built/ran out of the box on my BSD/OS-4.3.1 >> with gcc 2.95.3 like a charm; It took only 96 minutes to index my site;) > How does this compare to earlier 3.2.0b4 snapshots, and to 3.1.6? > Is 3.2.0b5 significantly slower than 3.1 releases, and is it better or > worse than earlier 3.2 betas? Neil Kohl Manager, ACP Online American College of Physicians [EMAIL PROTECTED] 215.351.2638, 800.523.1546 x2638 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl _______________________________________________ ht://Dig Developer mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
