On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:46:59 +1000
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Joe R. Jah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Christopher Murtagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [htdig-dev] boolean terms in phrase - bug?
>
> Greetings all,
>
> The attached patch should get things working.
Thanks Lachlan. What a relief! I have enabled boolean option on my
search forms again;)
Regards,
Joe
--
_/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o
_/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_
_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_)
_/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks again, Chris, for pointing this bug out.
>
> Cheers,
> Lachlan
>
>
> >-- Original Message --
> >On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Christopher Murtagh wrote:
> >
> >> That's what I thought. Thanks for the feedback. In my position, I'm
> >> fortunate that I have a php wrapper that is cleaning up all input before
> >> it is sent to htsearch, so I can write a little function that will strip
> >> these. However, it might be a good idea for the htdig team to let other
> >> folks who are currently using 3.2 in production about this as this makes
> >> it easy to cripple any machine running htdig 3.2 with boolean search
> >> feature.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
>From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the
one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
