According to Joe R. Jah:
> If it works we can fix 3.2.0b6 too:
>
> --- htsearch/Display.cc.orig Fri May 28 06:15:24 2004
> +++ htsearch/Display.cc Thu Jul 1 15:51:29 2004
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@
>
> if (maxScore != 0 && maxScore != minScore)
> {
> - int percent = (int)((ref->DocScore() - minScore) * 100 /
> + int percent = (int)((ref->DocScore() - minScore) * 100.0 /
> (maxScore - minScore));
> if (percent <= 0)
> percent = 1;
>
Thanks, Joe, but this shouldn't be an issue with the 3.2 code.
Not that your patch would hurt anything, and indeed it makes it more
clear what's going on, but it won't make any difference as far as
generated code. In 3.2, DocScore() and minScore are doubles, not ints,
so the multiplication will be done using doubles as well. The problem
in 3.1.x is DocScore() was an int.
The 3.1.6 patch seems bang on, as far as I can tell. This certainly
explains some of the complaints we've had in the past about weird
rankings in 3.1.x, but never got to the bottom of.
--
Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/
Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
