According to Robert Ribnitz: > the version of htdig 3.1.6 to include in Sarge will be the version > previously in Debian, plus all all patches for 3.1.6 with a later date > than the version on the website. Does it make sense to not patch up?
It certainly makes sense to include all bug fix patches from ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.1.6/, but not all patches there are bug fixes. Some of them may not be exactly what you want because they alter the behaviour from what's documented and/or expected, and may be lacking in documentation. It would be a judgement call whether to include what I'd consider to be optional patches such as AdjustableLoggingPatch.tar.gz, Google-style.0, collections.0, cookie.0, cookies.0.gz, masking_noindex.0, multiple-noindex.1, and ssl.12. However, most other patches there are pretty necessary bug fixes, or unobtrusive new features. -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/ Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ ht://Dig Developer mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
