On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
> FWIW I think this is reasonable, since the board have shared and equal > financial responsibility for the Conservancy account. In my view it's theoretically reasonable, however there is a real risk of red tape logjam. It's quite common for orgs to set a reasonable amount limit for expenditures not requiring formal votes, to reduce bureaucratic delays (i.e. waiting for the next meeting then spending time on it). It's also quite common for all such expenses to be accounted for anyway, and for the limit to be adjusted up or down per requirements, to better focus on the important issues at hand. Sean
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
