Hi On Feb 19, 2017 11:19 AM, "Samson Goddy" <samsongo...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 18 Feb 2017 10:51 p.m., "Dave Crossland" <d...@lab6.com> wrote: Hi There is no need to pay for ads because these as companies offer free credit to charities and libre projects like ours. Other than Google that gives ads credit worth $10k a month. I don't think facebook, twitter, instagram etc offers same. But if it true that would be nice. You maybe right.... Eg https://nonprofits.fb.com is just training info.... http://www.thenonprofittimes.com/news-articles/2-million-in-facebook-ads-going-to-nonprofits/ was a temporary thing for http://actionsprout.com/ As Caryl and Tony are discussing, the most basic things about the homepage can be improved. Was she talking about the homepage (website). There is a plan to redesign it at GSOC. I am also learning web development to further add more features to the site. Yes, I encourage you to review Tony's email about it :) I don't think a push on SMM is needed; indeed I don't think a push on any marketing is needed, until the mission / vision / goals / objectives are clarified, so the next few years have a direction. Until then as Samson days it's going in circles, not growing. Yeah i agree to this statement too, clearly we need mission statement to clarify what our goals are and to really know what to market. Who is responsible for these?? We are waiting for Sameer. I agree with Caryl about ditching the Python code base; let OLPC deal with it. Caryl stated a good point too. I believe i mentioned it in the motion. Letting people to more about Sugarizer. Because i believe that where the future lies. But there is still nothing wrong with the python base. There is now 1 real world deployment of sugarizer, thanks to efforts of the OLPC France community. This is a huge step from last year when I rejoined the community and there was not yet one. With that milestone now passed I think I would have recommended the font editor gsoc be done with js not Python. On Feb 18, 2017 1:10 AM, "Samson Goddy" <samsongo...@gmail.com> wrote: At the last meeting, i proposed a motion concerning funding the Social Media role, there where lot of questions asked. So this is the updated document, i think is something SL should really consider for the future of Sugar Labs. Below are the links of Social Media that already exist. [1] https://www.facebook.com/SugarLabsforall/ [2] https://twitter.com/sugar_labs [3] https://www.linkedin.com/company/454719?trk=vsrp_companies_c luster_name&trkInfo=VSRPsearchId%3A1954828041487359711037% 2CVSRPtargetId%3A454719%2CVSRPcmpt%3Acompanies_cluster [4] https://www.instagram.com/sugarlabsforall/
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep