I seem to recall a thread not too long ago where someone was asking for sites that had implemented Hiperbatch. You might want to check the archives. These tools should still be valid. Some of these tools require a specific need/setup (Hiperbatch). For general buffering, SMB is a good place to start, I guess. If you are looking for an automated process, there are several vendors that offer performance (LSR, NSR, etc) products for batch processing. We offer Velociraptor. Feel free to email me offline if you have any specific questions.
Larry Crilley Dino-Software, Inc. www.dino-software.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of gsg Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 4:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Hiperbatch, Smartbatch, Dynamic Cache Management Wondering if Hiperbatch, smartbatch, Dynamic Cache Management are still valid for improving performance with todays processors, DASD, OS etc... I don't think that we use any of these and are only now starting to look at SMB. Any feed back would be appreciated. And yes we are having performance problems. Actually, I think we are just maxing out our processor. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
