In <4f804f4a.3070...@valley.net>, on 04/07/2012
at 10:29 AM, Gerhard Postpischil <gerh...@valley.net> said:
>I ran into an analog of this trying to determine whether a program
>is running under TSO - presence of TSO control blocks does not
>indicate that the immediate caller was the TMP. IBM, for whatever
>reason, disallowed multiple TMP invocation in MVS (or perhaps SVS?),
>so these days one can just rely on the result from EXTRACT.
If you're running under TSO, won't the length of the PLIST tell you
whether you were invoked directly by a command? Anything other than a
CPPL means a call.
The original TMP ran unauthorized, including the TMP in SVS and OS/VS2
(MVS); if you look at the COOKIE command, you will see that a nested
TMP worked just fine. As I recall, it was the TSO Command Package[1]
that added the parallel TMP structure that required authorization.
[1] Swallowed by TSO/E when it came out.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
