No, he does not. One STCK value per each job run [the job that creates the DVD].
There will be no collisions because of one-to-one correspondence between the original and translated values. On Tue, 29 May 2012 06:17:08 -0700, Phil Smith <p...@voltage.com> wrote: >Victor Gil wrote: >>Since your values are 9 digits, how about taking 9 unique digits in the >>order 1,2,3...9, rearranging them RANDOMLY [say using the current STCK value >>and then merely TRANSLATE the original value using them as a translate table? >>[TR in Assmebler] > >Then he needs to keep a table of assigned values, to avoid collisions. It's >also not clear that STCK counts as "random", since it's monotonically >incrementing-crypto geeks don't like values like that. >-- >...phsiii > >Phil Smith III >p...@voltage.com<mailto:p...@voltage.com> >Voltage Security, Inc. >www.voltage.com<http://www.voltage.com/> >(703) 476-4511 (home office) >(703) 568-6662 (cell) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
