Pat, I'm copying what came into my reader. Did you hit the wrong button somewhere. I can't see anything new.
Chris Mason ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> Sent: Monday, 24 April, 2006 10:57 PM Subject: Re: Need Help defining an AS400 with an IP address to the mainframe On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:09:30 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/24/2006 > at 02:26 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >>I think the text you found logically, if not chronologically, >>precedes the introduction of the type 2.1 node and the introduction >>of the "control point" as the entity managing the node rather than >>always the PU. > >Chronologically, which is why I made sure to mention that it was old. >But the PUCP was already there. If you have a recent FAPL manual, is >there a section on nomenclature around p I-8? > >-- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> >We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. >(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
