Going from z/OS 1.6 to 1.8 I have noticed similar behavior. Is it more pronounced on terminals such as Mod 3 (32X80) versus Mod 5 (27X132)? If you use IPT I found some relief with OA20772. Otherwise I opened TSO and ISPF ETRs to no avail and still have a VTAM ETR outstanding.
Regards, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debbie Mitchell Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: VTAM question (***) On Mon, 21 May 2007 17:11:41 +0200, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I can't say I'd ever performed this sort of research but isn't the need to >regenerate - including reassembly - customized tables one of the sorts of >issues covered by the documentation a systems programmer goes through when >planning a new release? > As it turns out, the version of ISTINCLM in use here is not IBM's default. It was customized long before my tenure here and not documented. I will need to do some checking with other people here to see what they remember about the reason it was customized as well as what changes were made. Since no one is really complaining (at least not very loudly) about it, it won't be a priority. And, since posting my original question, I have noticed that the behavior is not consistent -- which leads me to believe that it is, indeed, related to changing screen sizes. Thank you all for your help. Debbie Mitchell Utica National Insurance Group ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
